Για πρώτη φορά, το Facebook έδωσε στη δημοσιότητα αναφορά διαφάνειας, στην οποία δίνει πληροφορίες σχετικά με τα αιτήματα διαφόρων χωρών για πληροφορίες των χρηστών του. Μία χώρα συνήθως ζητά από το Facebook, αλλά και από άλλα Κοινωνικά Δίκτυα, πληροφορίες όπως ονόματα χρηστών ή περιεχόμενο το οποίο έχουν δημοσιεύσει, όταν υπάρχουν επίσημες έρευνες γι’αυτούς, κάτι το οποίο σημαίνει πως ίσως εμπλέκονται σε κάποια εγκληματική ή άλλου είδους περίεργη δραστηριότητα.
Η Ελλάδα βρίσκεται μέσα στην αναφορά διαφάνειας του Facebook, η οποία αναφέρεται στους πρώτους έξι μήνες του 2013, έως και την 30η Ιουνίου. Ειδικότερα, η Ελλάδα ζήτησε 122 φορές δεδομένα χρηστών, τα οποία αφορούσαν συνολικά 141 χρήστες. Αυτό που κατάφερε είναι να δεχτεί το 54% των δεδομένων των οποίων ζήτησε, λίγο πιο πάνω από τις μισές δηλαδή. Το Facebook έχει συγκεκριμένη πολιτική πάνω στα αιτήματα των διαφόρων κυβερνήσεων και σέβεται την ιδιωτικότητα των χρηστών του, γι’αυτό και μελετά προσεκτικά όλα τα αιτήματα που δέχεται.
Πηγη: “socialmedialife.gr”
Δείτε παρακάτω όλες τις πληροφορίες
Transparency and trust are core values at Facebook. We strive to embody them in all aspects of our services, including our approach to responding to government data requests. We want to make sure that the people who use our service understand the nature and extent of the requests we receive and the strict policies and processes we have in place to handle them.
We are pleased to release our first Global Government Requests Report, which details the following:
• Which countries requested information from Facebook about our users
• The number of requests received from each of those countries
• The number of users/user accounts specified in those requests
• The percentage of these requests in which we were required by law to disclose at least some data
The report covers the first 6 months of 2013, ending June 30.
• Which countries requested information from Facebook about our users
• The number of requests received from each of those countries
• The number of users/user accounts specified in those requests
• The percentage of these requests in which we were required by law to disclose at least some data
The report covers the first 6 months of 2013, ending June 30.
As we have made clear in recent weeks, we have stringent processes in place to handle all government data requests. We believe this process protects the data of the people who use our service, and requires governments to meet a very high legal bar with each individual request in order to receive any information about any of our users. We scrutinize each request for legal sufficiency under our terms and the strict letter of the law, and require a detailed description of the legal and factual bases for each request. We fight many of these requests, pushing back when we find legal deficiencies and narrowing the scope of overly broad or vague requests. When we are required to comply with a particular request, we frequently share only basic user information, such as name.
More details about our approach to responding to government requests can be found here.
We hope this report will be useful to our users in the ongoing debate about the proper standards for government requests for user information in official investigations. And while we view this compilation as an important first report - it will not be our last. In coming reports, we hope to be able to provide even more information about the requests we receive from law enforcement authorities.
As we have said many times, we believe that while governments have an important responsibility to keep people safe, it is possible to do so while also being transparent. Government transparency and public safety are not mutually exclusive ideals. Each can exist simultaneously in free and open societies, and they help make us stronger. We strongly encourage all governments to provide greater transparency about their efforts aimed at keeping the public safe, and we will continue to be aggressive advocates for greater disclosure.
Data Requests
Country
|
Total Requests
|
Users / Accounts requested
|
Percentage of requests where some data produced
|
Albania
|
6
|
12
|
83 %
|
Argentina
|
152
|
218
|
27 %
|
Australia
|
546
|
601
|
64 %
|
Austria
|
35
|
41
|
17 %
|
Bangladesh
|
1
|
12
|
0 %
|
Barbados
|
3
|
3
|
0 %
|
Belgium
|
150
|
169
|
70 %
|
Bosnia and Herzegovina
|
4
|
11
|
25 %
|
Botswana
|
3
|
7
|
0 %
|
Brazil
|
715
|
857
|
33 %
|
Bulgaria
|
1
|
1
|
0 %
|
Cambodia
|
1
|
1
|
0 %
|
Canada
|
192
|
219
|
44 %
|
Chile
|
215
|
340
|
68 %
|
Colombia
|
27
|
41
|
15 %
|
Costa Rica
|
4
|
6
|
0 %
|
Croatia
|
2
|
2
|
0 %
|
Cyprus
|
3
|
4
|
33 %
|
Czech Republic
|
10
|
13
|
60 %
|
Denmark
|
11
|
11
|
55 %
|
Ecuador
|
2
|
3
|
0 %
|
Egypt
|
8
|
11
|
0 %
|
El Salvador
|
2
|
2
|
0 %
|
Finland
|
12
|
15
|
75 %
|
France
|
1,547
|
1,598
|
39 %
|
Germany
|
1,886
|
2,068
|
37 %
|
Greece
|
122
|
141
|
54 %
|
Hong Kong
|
1
|
1
|
100 %
|
Hungary
|
25
|
24
|
36 %
|
Iceland
|
1
|
1
|
100 %
|
India
|
3,245
|
4,144
|
50 %
|
Ireland
|
34
|
40
|
71 %
|
Israel
|
113
|
132
|
50 %
|
Italy
|
1,705
|
2,306
|
53 %
|
Ivory Coast
|
4
|
4
|
0 %
|
Japan
|
1
|
1
|
0 %
|
Kosovo
|
2
|
11
|
0 %
|
Lithuania
|
6
|
7
|
17 %
|
Macedonia
|
9
|
11
|
33 %
|
Malaysia
|
7
|
197
|
0 %
|
Malta
|
89
|
97
|
60 %
|
Mexico
|
78
|
127
|
37 %
|
Mongolia
|
2
|
2
|
0 %
|
Montenegro
|
2
|
2
|
0 %
|
Nepal
|
3
|
3
|
33 %
|
Netherlands
|
11
|
15
|
36 %
|
New Zealand
|
106
|
119
|
58 %
|
Norway
|
16
|
16
|
31 %
|
Pakistan
|
35
|
47
|
77 %
|
Panama
|
2
|
2
|
0 %
|
Peru
|
13
|
14
|
15 %
|
Philippines
|
4
|
4
|
25 %
|
Poland
|
233
|
158
|
9 %
|
Portugal
|
177
|
213
|
42 %
|
Qatar
|
3
|
3
|
0 %
|
Romania
|
16
|
36
|
63 %
|
Russia
|
1
|
1
|
0 %
|
Serbia
|
1
|
1
|
0 %
|
Singapore
|
107
|
117
|
70 %
|
Slovenia
|
6
|
8
|
50 %
|
South Africa
|
14
|
9
|
0 %
|
South Korea
|
7
|
15
|
14 %
|
Spain
|
479
|
715
|
51 %
|
Sweden
|
54
|
66
|
54 %
|
Switzerland
|
32
|
36
|
13 %
|
Taiwan
|
229
|
329
|
84 %
|
Thailand
|
2
|
5
|
0 %
|
Turkey
|
96
|
170
|
47 %
|
Uganda
|
1
|
1
|
0 %
|
United Kingdom
|
1,975
|
2,337
|
68 %
|
United States
|
11,000 - 12,000
|
20,000 - 21,000
|
79 %
|
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου
Ας είμαστε ευγενείς στο σχολιασμό.